Re[2]: 22.04.2023-22:45:33 :: six billion people can be wrong


node:	Re[2]: 22.04.2023-22:45:33
template:	4
parent:	Re: 22.04.2023-22:45:33
owner:	_W1 22/7
viewed by:
created:	23.04.2023 - 12:03:06

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63540
2111157
7930434
9058210
9058265
9058287

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

neurons
stats|by_visit|by_K source tiamat K|my_K|given_K last commanders polls
total descendants::14
total children::2
2 ❤️

show[ 2 | 3] flat

Moj plan je mat normalne s manzelkou shareovany keepass db file, kde su secrety ohladne domacnosti. Nie je dovod aby k tomu nemala pristup cely cas.
Ale diky

0000010100063540021111570793043409058210090582650905828709058359

greggie 23.04.2023 - 22:06:19 level: 1 UP New
Re[3]: 22.04.2023-22:45:33

to neriesi passwordy ku komunikacnym kanalom s milenkami pocas tvojho zivota

po smrti ti to uz moze byt jedno :)

more children: (2)
0000010100063540021111570793043409058210090582650905828709058290

akira 23.04.2023 - 12:24:49 (modif: 23.04.2023 - 12:27:07) level: 1 UP New Content changed
Re[3]: 22.04.2023-22:45:33

Ono skor ide o to, aby manzelka mala aktivne v pamati heslo od keepassu a brala obnovovanie jeho pamatovej stopy vazne.

Viem si predstavi ze pokial nie je niekto IT pracovnik co ma 300 hesiel od vsetkeho ma vsade rovnake heslo typu "B@zenka542#". A partnera ajtaka co sepka do ucha ze zapamataj si dobre heslo "VMQJxgW/Jp$jcIhAw04B" od superdolezitej keepass databazy neberie 100% vazne.

To uz aj IT kolegovia na mna zvyknu zazerat ked dam taketo heslo od HD na linuxovom "serveri" v testlabe (chce to po mne smernica).

more children: (1)