cwbe coordinatez:
101
63533
63608
8771344
9052382

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::9
total children::1
1 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


pytal som sa na lepsie zaspavanie, dalo mi to nejake techniky aj s odkazmi na papere ktore neboli halucinovane(!), nasledne tie studie kratko zhrnulo a zhodnotilo podla metodologie a impact factoru publikacie

zhrniak z chat history promptu https://pastebin.com/RUsy51eU :)

In our previous interaction, I provided you with evidence-based tips for falling asleep faster and more reliably. After you requested more information on relaxation techniques, I expanded on this topic by detailing five relaxation methods: progressive muscle relaxation, deep breathing exercises, mindfulness meditation, guided imagery, and autogenic training. Then, you asked for short reviews and reliability scores for the cited papers regarding relaxation techniques. I offered reviews and subjective reliability scores (on a scale of 0 to 100) for each paper based on the scientometric indicators and study design:

Vancampfort et al. (2013): Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 128(1), 12-20.
Reliability score: 70
Ma et al. (2017): Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 874.
Reliability score: 65
Ong et al. (2014): Sleep, 37(9), 1553-1563.
Reliability score: 80
Jallo et al. (2009): Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6(4), 463-470.
Reliability score: 50
Stetter & Kupper (2002): Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27(1), 45-98.
Reliability score: 60
I emphasized that these reliability scores are subjective estimates based on available information and that it is important to consider study design, sample size, and other methodological factors when assessing a study's reliability.