cwbe coordinatez:
101
8333809
8837211
8703087
9009497
9009558
9009587
9009764
9009800

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::5
total children::1
show[ 2 | 3] flat


EMA approved, išlo to rýchlo vzhľadom na podobnosť sa vakcínou upravenou na BA.1. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/adapted-vaccine-targeting-ba4-ba5-omicron-variants-original-sars-cov-2-recommended-approval

"The CHMP based its opinion in particular on the clinical data available with Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1. Apart from containing mRNA matching different, but closely related, Omicron subvariants, Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 and Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1 have the same composition. Clinical studies with Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1 showed that the vaccine was more effective at triggering an immune response against the BA.1 subvariant than Comirnaty, and was as effective as Comirnaty against the original strain. Side effects were comparable to those seen with Comirnaty. This was further supported by data from investigational vaccines targeting other variants which have also shown similar safety profiles and predictable immune responses against the strains they target. (...)

(...) The vaccine’s safety profile is expected to be comparable to that of Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1, and of Comirnaty itself for which a large amount of data is available.

Clinical studies with Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 are ongoing and the CHMP will receive emerging clinical data as they are being generated.

The CHMP opinion on Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 will now be sent to the European Commission, which will adopt a final decision. (...)"




00000101083338090883721108703087090094970900955809009587090097640900980009009868
Faust
 Faust      13.10.2022 - 14:24:07 (modif: 13.10.2022 - 14:25:26), level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Hej, nieco v podobnom zmysle som cital aj ja, preco to bolo streamlined a "is expected" mi nestaci.

Nepaci sa mi osobne takato skratka/zlahcenie a lahsie by sa mi rozhodovalo, kebyze uz teraz za tym je testovanie na ludoch.

Pripustam, ze moj pristup nie je uplne racionalny.

0000010108333809088372110870308709009497090095580900958709009764090098000900986809009902
Mathé
 Mathé      13.10.2022 - 15:51:33 , level: 2, UP   NEW
Absolútne z toho nie som rozrušená - veď nefunguje to tak náhodou aj pri každoročne updateovanej chrípkovej vakcíne? Je totiž dosť nerealistické, aby sa pri každej úprave na dominantné chrípkové vírusy uplynulej sezóny za po roka urobili trials s ľuďmi, čakali či sa nakazia a zároveň stihli výrobu a distribúciu?

0000010108333809088372110870308709009497090095580900958709009764090098000900986809009872
ddd
 ddd      13.10.2022 - 14:29:24 , level: 2, UP   NEW
ale ako chapeme sa ze to nie je 'is expected' lebo to ocakavas ty alebo ja, ale ze to hovori odborny panel ktory presiel vsetky dostupne data, testy, a tak, hej?

000001010833380908837211087030870900949709009558090095870900976409009800090098680900987209009876
Faust
 Faust      13.10.2022 - 14:34:55 (modif: 13.10.2022 - 14:37:18), level: 3, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Ano, preto ten moj disclaimer na konci.

Moj pohlad sa od boostera zmenil trocha z dovodu, ze sa podla mna vedlajsie ucinky zlahcuju (a ti, ktori nimi trpia, su niekedy zo strany lekarov/pro-vaccine verejnosti osocovani) a stat nad tym neprevzal vacsiu zodpovednost. Zjednodusenie klinickych studii mi doveru nepridalo.

00000101083338090883721108703087090094970900955809009587090097640900980009009868090098720900987609009903
Mathé
 Mathé      13.10.2022 - 15:54:17 , level: 4, UP   NEW
V jednom s tebou ale súhlasím - sme tak 20 rokov po tom, čo bolo na mieste vytvoriť fond na odškodenenie trvalých veľajších účinkov (aj v ČR to konečne prijali, u nás furt nič).
To je prinajmenšom férový prístup.