Asi hlupa otazka, ale snazim sa v tom zorientovat. Podla toho co citam, SSPL vravi o poskytovani softveru ako "service", typickym prikladom je teda napriklad AWS.

Takze moja otazka je: Ked niekto vytvori produkt (softver), ktory na pozadi pouziva MongoDB a tento produkt predava tretim stranam nie ako sluzbu, ale ako hotovy produkt, musi tiez postupvoat podla tejto licencie a teda bud zverejnit kod svojho produktu alebo platit?

2021-07-12: OpenSearch 1.0 is released!

Today is a really good day for the OpenSearch project. Since its start, the goal has been to quickly produce a version of OpenSearch that’s ready to use in production environments. After a ton of work by the OpenSearch community, we’re thrilled to announce the first general availability (GA) release of OpenSearch 1.0. Everyone in this highly-engaged and diverse community should be proud of the accomplishment in reaching this milestone together.

OpenSearch is a community-driven, open source search and analytics suite derived from Apache 2.0 licensed Elasticsearch 7.10.2 & Kibana 7.10.2. It consists of a search engine daemon (OpenSearch), a visualization and user interface (OpenSearch Dashboards), and advanced features from Open Distro for Elasticsearch like security, alerting, anomaly detection and more.

src: https://opensearch.org/blog/updates/2021/07/opensearch-general-availability-announcement/

AWS bude maintainovat svoje forky
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/stepping-up-for-a-truly-open-source-elasticsearch/

Vie niekto popisat, kde konci "every supporting piece of software"? Spustim si elastic niekde, tak povedzme musim zverejnit pluginy a pod, ale nejake sluzby s tym komunikujuce uz su mimo, nie?

podla mna mali nechat oddeleny plateny xpack a nechat zakladne featury.
takto (dufam) pomozu viac projektorm ako odfe (open distro for elasticsearch), lebo tie su momentalne v stave "nejak to funguje.." a evidentne maju problem dalej sledovat a "backportovat" zmeny v elasticu, ktorych je neurekom a u niektorych mam pocit ze su robene vyslovene len preto (resp takym sposobom) aby vysachovali "konkurenciu', ktora si nieco postavila na ich starsom kode.
taka tragikomedia..

nechapem co zmenou licencie z AGPL na SSPL ziskali - ma ich ta nova licencia viac ochranit pred Amazonom?

ked im Amazon kaslal na AGPL tak sa im asi vykasle aj na toto, nie?

edit: pisem o MongoDB, nie o Elastic-u

Ked to tak chucu mat, tak preco nie?
GPL a spol boli vymyslene vo svete kde takych sluzieb bolo minimum, ked sa zacali rozbiehat sluzby, vzniklo AGPL.

zaujimave. treba asi vydat vlastnu livenciu pre inu cast softwaru, ktora povie, ze nesmies zverejnit ziadnu cast kodu. akceptujes ju az po akceptovani licencie pre ELK. tym zrusis platnost tej SSPL.

SSPL je nejaky pravnicky joke