Re[2]: beh / bicykel a korona :: Remember, remember, the velvet November


node:	Re[2]: beh / bicykel a korona
template:	4
parent:	Re: beh / bicykel a korona
owner:	ddd
viewed by:
created:	09.04.2020 - 11:25:49

cwbe coordinatez:
101
8333809
8837211
8703087
8737614
8737616
8737713

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

co sa ti na tom nezda?

0000010108333809088372110870308708737614087376160873771308737722

ze to je nieco na styl, zdielajte kym nezmazu resp. je to neoverene

000001010833380908837211087030870873761408737616087377130873772208737727

no ja ti neviem. akoze jasne, je to 'neoverene' lebo to nepreslo cez peer review, ale povedat, ze white paper s autormi
Professor Civil Engineering at Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands and KU
Leuven, Belgium
Researcher Civil Engineering / Sports Aerodynamics at KU Leuven
je zdielajte kym nezmazu je trochu (dost) mimo.

00000101083338090883721108703087087376140873761608737713087377220873772708738233

Problem je, ze sa neunuvali zverejnit svoju metodologiu ani len ako preprint. Low low, sooo low, prisli v ramci medialneho attention whoringu vo vede tak nizko, ako sa len da.

00000101083338090883721108703087087376140873761608737713087377220873772708737810

to bolo len prirovnanie
myslim, ze ci uz si profesor alebo nie tvoj vedecke poznatky musia prejst peer review poukazujem len na to

0000010108333809088372110870308708737614087376160873771308737722087377270873781008737815

no 'musia' ale ved presne to pisu. napisanie formalneho clanku moze trvat roky a, v zavislosti od discipliny, peer review moze trvat dalsie roky, tak co, mali to dovtedy nezverejnit?
e: ako prirovnanie to bolo velmi, velmi nevhodne.

000001010833380908837211087030870873761408737616087377130873772208737727087378100873781508744387

no tak "zdielajte kym nezmazu" to bolo
https://dennikn.sk/1872483/nakazit-sa-koronavirusom-od-cyklistu-ci-bezca-to-tazko-hovoria-vedci/?ref=tit

00000101083338090883721108703087087376140873761608737713087377220873772708737810087378150874438708744404

paywall. fulltext?

pred paywallom vidim, ze "Americký portál Vox sa na uvedenú štúdiu pozrel bližšie a usúdil, že ju treba brať s veľkými rezervami.", k comu ako odporucanu literaturu navrhujem ISBN 978-0-19-046941-2

ale kukol som aj do papiera, kedze uz je public, a vidim ze "
This suggests that avoiding substantial droplet exposure in the conditions of this study
and in a way equivalent to the 1.5 m for people standing still can be achieved by one of two actions: either by
avoiding to walk or run in the slipstream of the leading person and keeping the 1.5 m distance in staggered or
side by side arrangement, or by keeping larger social distances, where the distances increase with the walking or
running speed.
[...]
The equivalent social distance for walking and running in the slipstream is defined as the distance that should be kept between the leading and trailing walker/runner to avoid substantial exposure to slipstream droplets, similar to the case where two people are standing still at 1.5 m distance. In the absence of head wind, tail wind and cross-wind, for walking fast at 4 km/h this distance is about 5 m and for running at 14.4 km/h this distance is about 10 m.
"

Takze kedze ti nerobi problem vyskum zhadzovat, rovnako ocakavam fundovanu analyzu toho, co je na tychto zaveroch nespravne a preco to je "zdielajte kym nezmazu".

000001010833380908837211087030870873761408737616087377130873772208737727087378100873781508737975

asi im to bude trvat dlhsie, je to bez rusok, a v bezvetri, cize zdielajte kym nezmazu