Zaujimave zhrnutie od prestiznych Edition Legislatives preco FR a ine krajiny odradzaju od uzivania rukavic a rusok. Nevravim ze viem, co je najlepsie, len si myslim ze sa opati poznat argumenty oboch stran. Lebo je pravda ze v teorii bariera moze byt ucinna, lenze v praxi, ak sa neaplikuje korektne a znizuje ine measures, moze sposobit viac skody nez uzitku.. Nehovorim o kybcanoch, no priemernemu slovakovi sa imho fakt bude zdat ze je uplne ok ist von s maskou, kdezto bez masky by trcal doma. Argumentacia s azijskymi krajinami v nasom kontexte moc nefunguje imho, lebo tam su ludia omnoho viac disciplinovanejsi.

The question of masks is a thorny one. The finest, called surgical, do not protect yourself but only protect others. Hence the fact that their wearing is not recommended by our health authorities. But as some people can be healthy carriers of the virus and contagious at the same time, one can, perhaps, imagine that the masks, including the least protective, can participate in slowing the spread of the virus.

Either way, there is not enough. This is where the public interest takes precedence over individual protection measures. "There is a tension on the masks. Faced with this tension, priorities are needed", explains Aurélien Rousseau clearly. Caregivers are obviously a priority.

In addition, scarves and scarves do not protect employees, their mesh does not stop viral particles. Again, this can even be more dangerous, since, without even realizing it, you constantly touch the scarf with your hands - potentially soiled - to hold it in place or reposition it.

full prelozeny clanok: https://kyberia.sk/id/8726978