toto je very cool aj ked porozumenie si ziada znalost lacanovskych terms

na druhej strane to dobre ilustruje vseobecne pozorovatelny totalitarny charakter japonskej civilizacie (yuck) a jej odvratenu stranku rozmanitost perverzii (toho mechanizmus)- zapad tak casto pritahujuci kewl aspekt (yuck)
https://ogswrs.blogspot.com/2019/01/why-lacan-says-no-one-who-dwells-in.html

Summary : It is often said that Lacan remarked that the Japanese are unanalysable, and in fact it is true that there are very few psychoanalysts and very little demand for analysis in Japan. I present here my reflections on this based on Lacan’s remarks about the Japanese language and the Joycean lalangue.


What in Japanese prevents one who dwells in that language from having a need or a possibility of experiencing psychoanalysis ? A possible Lacanian answer is : its lalinguistic structure which disfavours a signifier representing for another signifier the subject and which favours the predominance of master significance.

In actual Japanese society this conditions on one hand the prevalence of nationalistic paranoia, and on the other hand the prevalence of various sexual perversions which are so much various forms of acting out to escape from the suffocating effect of the predominance of master signifier.

Most of my patients come to psychoanalysis because they are not capable of being sufficiently pervert nor paranoiac in those particularly Japanese ways.

I only pray that more Japanese people may find the way of psychoanalytic sublimation to escape from those Japanese ways of paranoia and sexual perversions.