cwbe coordinatez:
866
1551575
2111232
8663388

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::6
total children::1
2 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


Medical images and health data belonging to millions of Americans, including X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans, are sitting unprotected on the Internet and available to anyone with basic computer expertise. The records cover more than 5 million patients in the United States and millions more around the world. In some cases, a snoop could use free software programs -- or just a typical Web browser -- to view the images and private data, an investigation by ProPublica and the German broadcaster Bayerischer Rundfunk found.

We identified 187 servers -- computers that are used to store and retrieve medical data -- in the U.S. that were unprotected by passwords or basic security precautions. The computer systems, from Florida to California, are used in doctors' offices, medical-imaging centers, and mobile X-ray services. The insecure servers we uncovered add to a growing list of medical records systems that have been compromised in recent years. Unlike some of the more infamous recent security breaches, in which hackers circumvented a company's cyber defenses, these records were often stored on servers that lacked the security precautions that long ago became standard for businesses and government agencies.
The exposed data varied depending on the health provider and the software they use. "For instance, the server of U.S. company MobilexUSA displayed the names of more than a million patients -- all by typing in a simple data query," reports ProPublica. "Their dates of birth, doctors, and procedures were also included."

"Another imaging system, tied to a physician in Los Angeles, allowed anyone on the Internet to see his patients' echocardiograms," the report adds. "All told, medical data from more than 16 million scans worldwide was available online, including names, birthdates, and, in some cases, Social Security numbers."

The authors of the report recommend you ask your health care provider or doctor if access to your images requires a login and password, and to ask if they conduct a regular security assessment as required by HIPAA.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/09/millions-of-americans-medical-images-and-data-are-available-on-the-internet/




0000086601551575021112320866338808663419
mirex
 mirex      18.09.2019 - 18:46:52 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Hodilo by sa to centralizovat a centralne zabezpecovat. Ale asi to maju velmi decentralizovane, a rozdrobene cez roznych dodavatelov.

000008660155157502111232086633880866341908663434
ulkas
 ulkas      18.09.2019 - 20:34:24 , level: 2, UP   NEW
mam pocit, ze o prispevok nizsie mas ukazku, co sa stane, ak to vlada centralizuje

00000866015515750211123208663388086634190866343408663500
mirex
 mirex      19.09.2019 - 07:41:27 (modif: 19.09.2019 - 07:41:51), level: 3, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Pises to akoby uz neexistovala ziadna nadej to zabezpecit. Priklad nizsie ukazuje zle zabezpecenie v jednom bode.

0000086601551575021112320866338808663419086634340866350008663518
ulkas
 ulkas      19.09.2019 - 09:04:26 , level: 4, UP   NEW
nejde o to, ide o vseobecnu paradigmu, ktora plati v kyber bezpecnosti. neexistuje ziaden agnosticky pristup, anispecificka architektura a riesenie, ktore ti zarucuje bezpecnost. jedina kyber bezpecna moznost je byt odpojeny od siete (aj to nie na 100%, prikladom su stare CRT monitory a meranie reliktoveho ziarenia v miestnosti).

vsetko ostatne je len obfuskacia, cize v principe ano, ziadna nadej nie je. mozes len rozumne zabezpecit system tak, aby sa to nikomu financne neoplatilo prelomit.

samozrejme, ze vsetky tieto zlyhania su do neba volajuce, otvorene neautorizovane pristupy atd. na druhu stranu, kolko inych systemov je rovnako otvorenych len su chranene nejakym chabym menom heslom atd.





kazdopadne, co som chcel povedat, ze bojim sa dat statu moznost centralne spravovat vsetky citlive udaje. kedysi sa vravelo, ze prakticky jedine institucie schopne bezpecnosti boli banky, az nakoniec narazila kosa na kamen a vera pohlova by mohla vypravat. ale imho toto asi stale plati doteraz, ze banky a top tech hraci (amazon, paypal, google) su toho schopne do urcitej miery. ale osobne nie som presvedceny o centralizacii ako vobec o vhodnej architekture. ked uz, tak otvoreny kryptovany blockchain, ktory sice vie citat hocikto, ale dekryptovat iba ten, komu to ty svojou penazenkou dovolis ty sam.

000008660155157502111232086633880866341908663434086635000866351808667568
Burning A
 Burning A      01.10.2019 - 23:32:15 (modif: 01.10.2019 - 23:39:45), level: 5, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
paradox je ze top tech hraci su schopni bezpecnosti citlivych udajov len preto ze zaroven su pre nich citlive udaje (v urcitom stupni statistickej anonymizacie), zaroven zdrojom prijmov ktory tuto ochranu citlivych udajov financuje, a tym aj motivuje, lebo je to prenich asset, produkt. chrania citlive udaje preto ze ich v urcitom stupni (ktory ani sami nedokazu posudit) anonymizuju (alebo aj nie, podla ponuky) a predavaju. ta anonymizacia je tam len forma encrypcie ktora brani tomu aby data niekto skopiroval a odstavil ich de facto od prijmu a moznosti ich predavat.
Keby bola moznost dat kluce k enduser datam len niekomu, moznost spenazit tie data by sa presunul blizsie k tomu kto ich produkuje, ako keby sa zemiak sam predaval po tom co je vyorany :D ale to je tiez moznost, v kazdom pripade je potrebny traktor/infrastruktura ktora tie data spristupnuje a dokaze z nich robit asset, lebo jeden konkretny zemiak z pola nikoho nezaujima, zatial.

00000866015515750211123208663388086634190866343408663500086635180866756808667583
ulkas
 ulkas      02.10.2019 - 08:33:18 , level: 6, UP   NEW
ono je viacero konceptov, ako by toto technicky islo robit a giganti by az tak netratili.

predstav si, ze si zapojeny do facebooku, ale svoj profil a data si hostujes sam (pripadne delegujes niekomu dalsiemu), pricom mas pre FB otvoreny interface, ktorym si to moze on citat. v principe by FB fungoval rovnako ako doteraz, odhliadnuct od nejakej rychlosti nacitavania co sa da stale vyriesit casom.

iny koncept napriklad online marketingu - teraz sa pekne zbieraju data centralne ohladom uzivatelskej aktivity, potom sa z toho klasifikuju kadejake kategorie a modeluju sa skupiny ludi, ktorym sa potom nuka reklama, na zaklade tych pozbieranych dat. nejaky ind spravil davnejsie koncept taky, ze ty si tie svoje data drzis u seba, a samotnemu providerovi posielas len ten svoj profil samotny, tj do akych skupin spadas. cize tie data su realne u teba a provider ma stale rovnaky biznis model, na ktorom zaraba.


je to vsetko aj technicky realizovatelne, ale osobne sa tu skor bavime o bezpecnosti, cize je jedno aky mas koncept tak ci onak ho niekto nabura a dostane sa k tym citlivym datam. preto osobne by som bol skor za to nezavislejsie sifrovanie, kde kluce od miesacky drzi len samotny uzivatel (teda bavime sa o statnych registroch, kde nie je potreba instant odpovede. v online reklame to potrebujes hned).