cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
63556
63998
8551114

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::5
total children::4
6 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


The trolling trio wondered, they write, if a journal might even "publish a feminist rewrite of a chapter from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf." Yup. "Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism" was accepted by the feminist social-work journal Affilia.
...
https://www.chronicle.com/article/Sokal-Squared-Is-Huge/244714




000001010006353900063556000639980855111408551516
plaintext
 plaintext      07.10.2018 - 11:20:09 , level: 1, UP   NEW
https://slate.com/technology/2018/10/grievance-studies-hoax-not-academic-scandal.html

000001010006353900063556000639980855111408551219
Prospero
 Prospero      05.10.2018 - 16:33:26 [3K] , level: 1, UP   NEW
A good example is an article from the Australasian Journal of Philosophy in which a feminist describes a “phallic drama” involving two statements, p and ~p (the negation of p):

There is really only one actor, p, and ~p is merely its receptacle. In the representation of the Venn diagram, p penetrates a passive, undifferentiated universal other which is specified as a lack, which offers no resistance, and whose behavior it controls completely.

Note that this is no longer a Sokal-type hoax but an instance of authentic feminist philosophy. Sometimes it is impossible to tell the difference.
https://quillette.com/2018/10/01/the-grievance-studies-scandal-five-academics-respond/

00000101000635390006355600063998085511140855121908551225
evad
 evad      05.10.2018 - 17:28:00 , level: 2, UP   NEW
K za ten citat, ale ten linkovany clanok z Guilette mi pride dost skreslujuci vyberom oslovenych akademikov

000001010006353900063556000639980855111408551134
evad
 evad      05.10.2018 - 11:24:48 (modif: 05.10.2018 - 11:41:27) [1K] , level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
uz to dva dni priebezne studujem https://kyberia.sk/id/8550559

zatim som precitala par clankov zbezne a teda su tam priserne flaws. nechapem ako sa to mohlo publikovat, fakt dost velka ostuda pre dany field.
a neskutocne su tie reviewers comments. taky nadseny a ideology enhanced styl, uplne ine nez dostavame v psychology alebo v gerontology. fakt doporucujem pozriet na tom ich google drive.

na druhej strane, ich vyskumna metoda (ked berieme cely projekt) je ako sami hovoria etnograficka reflexivna studia. etnograficke studie sa ale nerobia s dopredu jasnou hypotezou, takze to je zakladny flaw ich pristupu. autori proste dopredu vedia co chcu dokazat a to zas narusuje validitu. a reflexie tam tiez maju na moj vkus (v porovnani s inymi etnografickymi studiami) malo.



000001010006353900063556000639980855111408551125
bakany
 bakany      05.10.2018 - 11:03:00 , level: 1, UP   NEW
niekde na hrane medzi "mohlo by sa stat aj inde" a "ked sa ideologia tvari ako veda". skor to druhe.





axone Science fetish