login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[2]: len tak na margo
template:
4
parent:
Re: len tak na margo
owner:
zviera
viewed by:
created:
29.06.2018 - 09:52:28
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63529
3814601
8517038
8517233
8517317
8517575
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::3
total children::1
1
❤️
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
to sa volá Kup si svou revoltu
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063529038146010851703808517233085173170851757508517673
rubik1983[Locked_OUT]
29.06.2018 - 11:25:20
[
1K
] , level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: len tak na margo
ja to poznam ako "Kup si vzpouru!"
000001010006352903814601085170380851723308517317085175750851767308517724
ksyz
29.06.2018 - 12:31:10
[
1K
] , level: 2,
UP
NEW
cca
00000101000635290381460108517038085172330851731708517575085176730851772408517757
rubik1983[Locked_OUT]
29.06.2018 - 13:44:02
(modif: 29.06.2018 - 13:45:29), level: 3,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re: cca
0000010100063529038146010851703808517233085173170851757508517670
aufhebung
29.06.2018 - 11:20:19
(modif: 29.06.2018 - 11:22:29), level: 1,
UP
NEW
HARDLINK
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
The ideology of the ethical consumption gap
https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_451526_en.pdf
The growth of contemporary capitalism is producing a broad sweep of environmental and socialills, such as environmental degradation, exploitative labor conditions, social and economic inequity,and mental and physical illness. A growing awareness of these significant consequences by an ‘‘ethical’’ consumer segment has catalyzed a field of research dedicated to investigating ethical consumerism. Of particular academic and practitioner focus is the general failure of this ethical consumer segment to ‘‘walk their talk’’—the ethical consumption attitude–behavior ‘gap’. In this
article, we draw on Althusser and Žižek to critically analyze the ideological functioning of the ethical consumption gap. We argue that this focus inadvertently promotes erroneous notions of consumer sovereignty and responsibilization. We conclude with a call to reimagine the gap as a construct that paradoxically preserves—rather than undermines—dominant and destructive consumerist capitalism. We redirect research toward the underlying capitalist structures that predicate and benefit from the gap.