 |
|
| node: | Re[2]: Is 100% renewable energy realistic? Here’s what we know. |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re: Is 100% renewable energy realistic? Here’s what we know. |
| owner: | jurov |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 10.04.2017 - 14:35:05 |
| updated: | 10.04.2017 - 14:37:19 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 101 63529 63883 8326829 8327481 8327489 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::1
total children::1
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/nuclear/
Podla mna je to z velkej casti FUD. Ale ked uz podlahla aj (jadrova fyzicka) Merkelova tak atom RIP. Budeme asi spalovat uhlie/plyn s ukladanim CO2 a postupne nabiehat solar + wind + baterie.
Elon Musk zistil ze pouzite litiove baterie z aut su stale po 10 rokoch pouzitelne na vyrovnavanie zataze elektrickej siete(aj individualne v domoch, aj uz instaloval 80MWh "elektraren" v Kalifornii). Ci to takymto sposobom pojde pokryt vsetko, neviem.
Historia, meretrix vitae.
Podla mna je to z velkej casti FUD. Ale ked uz podlahla aj (jadrova fyzicka) Merkelova tak atom RIP. Budeme asi spalovat uhlie/plyn s ukladanim CO2 a postupne nabiehat solar + wind + baterie.
Elon Musk zistil ze pouzite litiove baterie z aut su stale po 10 rokoch pouzitelne na vyrovnavanie zataze elektrickej siete(aj individualne v domoch, aj uz instaloval 80MWh "elektraren" v Kalifornii). Ci to takymto sposobom pojde pokryt vsetko, neviem.
Historia, meretrix vitae.