login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re: 17.07.2015-19:24:31
template:
4
parent:
17.07.2015-19:24:31
owner:
arius
viewed by:
created:
24.07.2015 - 11:41:19
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
63542
2109677
1857521
7961524
7966291
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::4
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
pridavam sa k nizsie spominanemu exfat-u
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063540000635420210967701857521079615240796629107969170
domINo
28.07.2015 - 20:52:20
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: 17.07.2015-19:24:31
okay a ako riesis veci nad 4GB?
000001010006354000063542021096770185752107961524079662910796917007969201
xrat
28.07.2015 - 21:44:30
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 17.07.2015-19:24:31
to je limit FAT32, nie exFAT.
00000101000635400006354202109677018575210796152407966291079691700796920107969210
domINo
28.07.2015 - 21:53:44
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[4]: 17.07.2015-19:24:31
jaj tak... a potom to exFAT ma nejake obmedzenia oproti ostatnym particiam?
0000010100063540000635420210967701857521079615240796629107969170079692010796921007969467
xrat
29.07.2015 - 09:41:39
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[5]: 17.07.2015-19:24:31
no nikdy nebude tak vymazlena ako hfs (zurnalovanie, celkovo ochrana dat pri nepredvidanych vypadkoch napajania). cize ako som spominal, ak ho mas pouzivat 99% casu s osx, tak radsej hfs a daj si tam malicku exfat particiu s instalackou nejakeho toolu co vie citat mac disky pre pripad nudze.