Re: This is why you shouldn’t believe that exciting new medical study :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re: This is why you shouldn’t believe that exciting new medical study
template:	4
parent:	This is why you shouldn’t believe that exciting new medical study
owner:	Weaponized Cringe
viewed by:
created:	24.03.2015 - 18:34:24

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
63556
63998
7872219
7872685

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

"It’s a fact that all studies are biased and flawed in their own unique ways." - nejaky dokaz tohoto tvrdenia?

00000101000635390006355600063998078722190787268507872747

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/most_medical_research_is_flawed_says_leading_medical_editor
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

e: a ten clanok z PlosOne je tu este prerozpravany jednoduchsim stylom http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2013/09/09/richard-smith-time-for-science-to-be-about-truth-rather-than-careers/

0000010100063539000635560006399807872219078726850787274707875143

to je fajn, no tam vyssie bolo napisane "all" a nie "most", co je podla mna dost rozdielny message.
okrem toho kvantitativneho rozdielu medzi "most" a "all" (tj nula az polovica vsetkych studii minus jedna) to s tym "all" navyse vyznieva, akokeby sa unflawed && unbiased studia ani nedala z principu urobit.

000001010006353900063556000639980787221907872685078727470787514307875150

:)
tak to je jeden z rozdielov medzi popularnymi a vedeckymi clankami