No to prave nedava, pretoze ten paper nie je cost-benefit analyza. To je proste uplna ina tema.

e: ochutnavka:

III. WHY RUIN IS SERIOUS BUSINESS
The risk of ruin is not sustainable. By the ruin theorems, if
you incur a tiny probability of ruin as a "one-off" risk, survive
it, then do it again (another "one-off" deal), you will eventually
go bust with probability 1. ... For this reason a strategy
of risk taking is not sustainable and we must consider any
genuine risk of total ruin as if it were inevitable.

The good news is that some classes of risk can be deemed
to be practically of probability zero: the earth survived trillions
of natural variations daily over 3 billion years, otherwise we
would not be here. By recognizing that normal risks are not
in the category of ruin problems, we recognize also that it
is not necessary or even normal to take risks that involve a
possibility of ruin.

pripadne:
Because the “cost” of ruin is effectively infinite, cost-benefit
analysis (in which the potential harm and potential gain are
multiplied by their probabilities and weighed against each
other) is no longer a useful paradigm. Even if probabilities
are expected to be zero but have a non-zero uncertainty,
then a sensitivity analysis that considers the impact of that
uncertainty results in infinities as well. The potential harm is
so substantial that everything else in the equation ceases to
matter. In this case, we must do everything we can to avoid
the catastrophe.