cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
4879893
7328524
7330171
7330193

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::1
total children::1
show[ 2 | 3] flat
ak ma pamat neklame, tak v taktomto porovnani by vyhral nejaky havajsky ostrov
inak neviem

edit: tak plati to iba pri porovnani od zakladne stitu "Hawaii's Mauna Kea, though, rises an astonishing 33,476 feet (10,203 meters) from the depths of the Pacific Ocean floor. Measuring from base to peak, Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain on earth."




00000101000635390487989307328524073301710733019307330248
ahram
 ahram      17.09.2013 - 20:35:56 , level: 1, UP   NEW
ó. Zaujimave, ako su veci relativne. Hemzime sa po ostrovoch niektorych tak velkych, ze su kontinentami trciacimi z vody, aj v nizkej vyske nad morom sme vlastne dost vysoko od dna.. Este si zahaluzim - ake by boli nasledky velkeho poklesu hladiny mori/oceanov? Predpokladam, ze by to pekne narusilo pocasie - kolobeh vody, tiez velky vplyv ma energia ulozena v tej vode (absorbia a uvolnovanie tepla a to iste s CO2). Plus zaujimavy efekt by mal pokles na hladiny riek - prehlbenie delt (mozno aj vacsich usekov toku). A ktovie ci by sucasne rovnako neklesli aj hladiny podzemnych vod..