
node:	Kartove hry & hracie karty
template:	2
parent:	Hobby a volny cas
owner:	Ljubes
viewed by:
created:	05.02.2012 - 19:15:38
updated:	07.02.2012 - 23:51:06

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63564
6484216

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

pUnKA

Kartové hry

Kartové hry na wikipédii: [SK] [EN]

Pravidlá niektorých hier:
- Poker - Mariáš - Kanasta - Žolíky - Bridž - Sedma - Autobus - Solitér - Pexeso -
Obľúbujete iné kartové hry? Zaujímajú Vás ich pravidlá? Máte nejaké rady alebo stratégie? Dajte vedieť...
Ovládate nejaké triky s kartami? Chcete vedieť alebo viete ako kúzla funguúu? Zazdieľajte videá, návody, ...

00000101000635640648421606484224

Kuzla s kartami

Mate radi kartove kuzla?
Ovladate nejake triky s kartami?
Chcete vediet alebo viete ako kuzla funguju?

0000010100063564064842160648422406484337

0000010100063564064842160648422406484335

00000101000635640648421602952616

Texas Hold 'em Poker

Texas Hold'em Poker	Pravidlá	Prezývky kombinácií
EN Wiki / SK Wiki	EN Wiki / PokerPortal.info	EN wiki

Najznámejšie turnaje:

World Poker Tour (WPT)

European Poker Tour (EPT)

Česká Pokerová Tour (CPT)

Asia Pacific Poker Tour (APPT)

Turnaje na Slovensku:
Turnajový kalendár (PokerPortal.info)

00000101000635640648421602952616

Texas Hold 'em Poker

Texas Hold'em Poker	Pravidlá	Prezývky kombinácií
EN Wiki / SK Wiki	EN Wiki / PokerPortal.info	EN wiki

Najznámejšie turnaje:

World Poker Tour (WPT)

European Poker Tour (EPT)

Česká Pokerová Tour (CPT)

Asia Pacific Poker Tour (APPT)

Turnaje na Slovensku:
Turnajový kalendár (PokerPortal.info)

0000010100063564064842160295261609310997

sice nemam rad jeho sekany a prizvukovany styl vypravania, ale typek (pro s 10M$ winnings na turnajoch) zacal teraz robit seriu na low stake cash games. zatial ma za sebou druhu sessions, hodinovka za 160$ co je uplne sialene:

000001010006356406484216029526160931099709310999

llmku som dal zosumarizovat pekne do tabulky jeho handy:
medium

TOTAL SUMMARY
Metric Value
Total net profit (approx) ~+$984

Winning hands 14
Losing hands 7
Biggest win +$540
Biggest loss -$115
total hours 3.5hours

0000010100063564064842160295261609310286

Dostal som zadarmo vstupenku v hodnote 0,5$ -> z toho som vyhral 2$ vstupenku
-> z toho 10$ -> až nakoniec som mal 150$ vstupenku,
ktorú som použil v nedeľu, 22. marca do GGMaster150$.

Turnaje už vôbec nehrám (už iba cash game na mikro stakes) a teda môj jediný cieľ bolo hrať opatrne a pokúsiť sa dostať do peňazí.

Nakoniec sa mi zázrakom po 10 hodinách podarilo skončiť až na finálovom stole.

Zostrihal som všetkých tých málo hands ktoré som vyhral za celý turnaj (fakt sú tam všetky),
až po tú poslednú ktorú nie;

Až teraz keď to takto vidím s odstupom čase si uvedomujem aké šialené štastie som mal v tom turnaji vždy keď bolo treba!,)

000001010006356406484216029526160931028609310998

prave si to prehravam a teda fakt ti isla karta. vacsinu spotov si trafil value, ked bolo treba vyriverovat tak to prislo. a ked si dostal AA tak ti to niekto pf zaplatil. vsetky cbet bluffy ti zahodili. ani jedno AK si neprehral (!). to si dal zostrih len vitaznych ruk ci co?
velmi malo tazkych handov, kde by si musel riesit rozhodovanie, tusim 2x som videl tazku situaciu a to trvalo tak 1 street nez to super vzdal.

00000101000635640648421602952616093102860931099809311228

áno len vitaznych,
a hej, cele to bola jedna velka anomalia moja ucast v tomto turnaji,)

000001010006356406484216029526160931028609310607

wow ty si vyhral 20k dolarov za toto? ale tak je to robota, desat hodin na turnaji :)

00000101000635640648421602952616093102860931060709310669

robota to pre mna veru je, ale tak MTTturnaje su take ze musis mat vela stastia aby si sa dostal daleko lebo tam je vela hracov.) preto ich bežne nehram,)

0000010100063564064842160295261609303840

dnes sa mi podarilo zahrat s8 flush, torchu mi to ale typek posral tym raisom na turne, podla mna mal len callnut a neodplasit typka na buttone. ved raisol cca tolko, kolko by ten typek s Kackom docalloval...
tu je video, neviem ako to embednut:
https://my.pokercraft.com/embedded/shared/hand-replay/QMwPNnrmnP1LNrxnEQMWU

0000010100063564064842160295261609301511

tento aero zacal byt teraz popularny, vloguje low stakes 1-3$ a zevraj ma uspechy jak svina. teraz dal jednu lahku session, 3 hodiny play, 100 hands, a zajebal +1600$. ale je pravda, ze na tom stole boli fakt ze easy ryby toto:

0000010100063564064842160295261609300214

nieco oddychove, rozne sposoby ojebavania, od znacenych balickov, cez podvadzanie pri miesani, az po znacenie si kariet pri zivej hre:

0000010100063564064842160295261609298356

https://www.primedope.com/poker-variance-calculator/

0000010100063564064842160295261609297827

0000010100063564064842160295261609297783

poker alebo citrony?

000001010006356406484216029526160929778309297806

v inom videu s inym typkom:

7) Poker future + “is poker dying?” — expanded TL;DR (from this interview)

Core claim:
He says the old narrative (“poker is dying”) aged poorly. Poker isn’t dying—it’s still active and, by what he hears/sees (incl. Hendon Mob/GPI numbers + live rooms), it’s growing again, but the center of gravity shifted.

What changed (his view)

Online ecosystem flipped: PokerStars no longer being #1 is his “wow” moment → signals a new market structure and distribution (big new operators + alternative ecosystems).

Rise of “clubs / private games on mobile”: He points to mobile-app “club” style poker where people play private groups/parties—less like the old open-lobby grinder economy, more like social pods.

Live poker still looks healthy: He uses Marrakech as a concrete example: he revisited and saw the poker room “growing,” plus he still sees lots of the same familiar poker faces and activity.

His “why poker isn’t dead” logic

There’s still a durable live community. He emphasizes continuity: many of the same players from 10–15 years ago are still around.

Poker keeps reinventing formats and distribution. Even if the game is the same, how people access it is changing (mobile clubs, new operators, different funnels).

His own data lens: He owns Hendon Mob/GPI, and he implies the business is healthy/profitable—i.e., the underlying “poker economy” still generates attention and results.

The nuance / limitation he admits

He’s not fully “in it” anymore, so he won’t give a confident forward-looking “vision” now like he would 10 years ago.

The “poker is dying” conversation he was part of back then was tied to a specific strategy: turn poker into a sport/esport (GPL era). That didn’t scale for his project—but that failure ≠ poker dying.

Practical takeaway (meta)

Don’t think “poker dying vs thriving.” Think: poker migrating:

from open online lobbies → new ecosystems (big new sites + clubs)

from online dominance → stronger live + hybrid attention

from mass new-player churn → a stickier, aging community (his “old guys still there” joke)

000001010006356406484216029526160929778309297804

Sure — here’s a deeper, structured read of **Topic 13: why Eugene thinks online poker is “dying” / unsustainable**, based on what he says in the interview.

## What he means by “dying”

He’s not saying poker disappears tomorrow. He’s saying **the current form of online poker becomes less and less viable as a mass-market game** because the ecosystem can’t reliably bring in (and keep) enough recreational money.

---

## The core problem: recreational players don’t get “time-for-money” anymore

Eugene frames it from the POV of a casual player:

* They come home, deposit ~$100 to relax.
* They can choose poker or casino games (slots/roulette/etc.).
* **Years ago**, poker could feel like: “maybe I can win, and even if I lose it lasts a while.”
* **Now**, he thinks poker often feels like: “I get crushed fast.”

His punchline is basically:

> If you’re purely recreational, you may get **more entertainment per dollar** in casino games than in online poker today.

That is devastating for poker because…

---

## Poker needs “new money” (the ecosystem argument)

Poker is not like a normal product where the house just provides entertainment.

* Poker is a **player-vs-player economy**.
* The site earns rake, but the money *circulates* between players.
* For the system to thrive, it needs a steady stream of **losing / casual money** coming in.

If rec players stop depositing because they feel hopeless or cheated, then:

* games dry up,
* pros fight each other for thin edges,
* rake + variance make it worse,
* and liquidity declines (fewer tables, fewer formats, less fun).

So the “dying” isn’t one event — it’s **ecosystem decay**.

---

## Why it’s getting worse now: tools + bots + real-time help

He points to the arms race:

### 1) Bots

If sites can’t reliably detect and remove bots, a casual player risks unknowingly playing in a rigged pool.

### 2) Real-time assistance (RTA)

Even more corrosive than “studying” is **in-game assistance** (or highly optimized decision support).
To a recreational, it doesn’t matter whether the opponent is a bot, using RTA, or just a grinder with perfect ranges — the experience is:

* “I’m outclassed and don’t stand a chance.”

### 3) Solver-era baseline skill

Even without cheating, the average competence level has risen.
So the pool becomes:

* less punty,
* more aggressive,
* harder to exploit,
* and tougher for casuals to feel competitive.

Net effect: **pros (and cheaters) keep more of the pie**, casuals churn faster.

---

## The “pro edge” is now too big (and that breaks the game)

This is his central economic claim:

> Online poker must **lower the advantage** that pros / tool users have over pure recreational players.

He’s basically saying:

* If the edge is huge, casuals don’t want to sit in the game.
* If the edge is smaller, casuals can have fun, win sometimes, and stick around longer.

Poker’s paradox:

* Pros want big edges.
* Poker’s survival needs edges that are **small enough** that casuals keep playing.

---

## Why “just ban cheaters” isn’t enough

Even with good security, the modern baseline is so strong that the “fun gap” is still a problem.

So he’s implying poker needs **structural change**, not only policing.

---

## What change looks like (without “changing poker too much”)

He gives examples of the direction online poker is already moving:

* bomb pots
* “squid game” / splashy formats
* mystery bounties
* more gamble-y mechanics

**But** he adds a constraint:

* If you change the game too much, it stops feeling like poker, and people don’t stick.
* So the solution must be: *keep it familiar*, but tweak it so it’s fun + sustainable.

This is basically a design challenge:

* add chaos / action / novelty,
* reduce skill leverage,
* keep the identity of poker intact.

---

## The underlying product-design thesis

What he’s really arguing is:

Online poker needs to become a better *consumer entertainment product*, not just a “perfect competition” arena.

That means optimizing for:

* fun,
* retention,
* fairness perception,
* and “I can win sometimes.”

Not optimizing for:

* max skill expression,
* and pure EV extraction.

---

## What he’s working on

He hints he’s building a company where he’ll be responsible for “the poker side,” targeting exactly this sustainability problem — but he doesn’t reveal details.

---

## Practical implications (if you’re a player)

If his thesis is right, you’ll see more of:

* more gimmicky / action formats,
* faster-paced pools,
* more variance baked in,
* more “TV poker” mechanics online,
* heavier security / anti-RTA measures,
* possibly tighter segregation of recs vs regs (some sites already do variants of this).

---

0000010100063564064842160295261609297716

tldr:
**TL;DR — Low-stakes players are way more aggressive and bluffing more than they were 5–7 years ago.**

What changed?

### 1. **They bluff more in “never-bluff” spots**

* River check-raise jams after triple barrels
* Nut-flush blocker bluffs (e.g., stiff ace of diamonds)
* Board-pairing turns where value combos shrink
* Small in-position triple barrels
* Turn raises after flop checks through (when new draws appear)

These used to be massively under-bluffed. Not anymore.

---

### 2. **They’re copying solver / high-stakes concepts**

Even rec players now:

* Use **nut blockers** correctly
* Find “theoretical” bluff spots
* Run big river bluffs
* Understand pressure spots better

Basically: YouTube + streams + GTO content trickled down.

---

### 3. **Sizing tells have shifted**

More bluffs using:

* 3x raise sizes
* Doubling previous street sizing

These quick, “standard” sizes are showing up more as bluff indicators.

---

### 4. **Preflop is more aggressive**

* More light 3-bets on the button
* More polarized squeezes (very strong hands + junk suited hands)
* Rec players are no longer just calling everything

---

### 5. **Low SPR = more betting mistakes**

In 3-bet/4-bet pots when stacks are short:

* Players shove marginal hands more often
* They’d rather jam than face tough decisions later

Aggression > passivity now.

---

## Big Picture

Seven years ago:

* Pool under-bluffed
* Overfolding was profitable
* Passive tendencies dominated

Now:

* Pool bluffs more
* Aggression has increased
* Old “pre-COVID nit” adjustments get punished

If you’re still massively overfolding in big spots, you’re probably getting exploited.

---

**Bottom line:**
Low stakes isn’t “fit-or-fold, value town only” anymore.
It’s more bluff-heavy, more aggressive, and more strategically aware than it used to be.

0000010100063564064842160295261609293431

odporucam tohoto typka sledovat, posledny rok zapracoval na svojom style a jeho videa posledne mesiace stoja za to. tunak zrovna jedno cerstve pre low stakes hracov:

000001010006356406484216029526160929343109293465

nerozumiem ale aký to ma úplne zmysel, tá jeho challenge. no dobre, dostaneš sa keď ti bude priať variácia na vyššie limity a potom skôr alebo neskôr príde downswing a bez dostatočného bankrollu ak nebudeš vedieť pokriť tie swingy a mentálne to ovplyvní tvoju a-game sa budeš musieť vrátiť na nižšie limity ktoré si môžeš dovoliť. (a nie, to nie je pesimismus, ale realita, ako to často funguje) takže ak človek má bankroll a jeho hra je profitabilnejšia vyššie, tak prečo neskúsiť hrať vyššie rovno, ak bankroll nemá, stále to skúsiť môže, ale viacmenej jeho osud je v rukách variácie
a teda je to poriadny gambling,)

každopádne zaujímavý kanál, dík!

00000101000635640648421602952616092934310929346509293471

ak si pozries jeho ine videa z poslednych mesiacov, tak on hrava vyssie staky, nl1000+

teraz venoval hodinu hraniu nizkych stakov. co citavam komentare, tak vela ludi chce vidiet tie micro stakes hry, lebo tam sa to fakt tazko hra podla akejkolvek teorie. vela ludi sa chce posunut vyssie ale nemozu, lebo nevedia porazat ani micro.

mne sa ale nepaci, ze hral zrovna rush n cash. to je taka subkultura sama o sebe, tam je kazdy nit lebo hras len autopilota, zbytocne tam komentuje, kto je aky tight regular...

ale inak super vysvetluje veci, ma talent rozpravaca

0000010100063564064842160295261609293431092934650929347109293976

imho ja si myslím, že byť break-even hráč na mikro limitoch nie je až také náročné, vyžaduje to odohrať dáke tie desiatky až stovky hodín kvalitného času pri 9tablingu a osvojiť si niektoré veci a následne si budovať bankroll na vyššie limity čisto z rakebacku a bonusov, len to dáku tú chvíľu trvá no.)

000001010006356406484216029526160929343109293439

sranda twl pzoerat, ako sa trapil na nl2, potom na nl5 uz mu to slo kusocek lepsie a najlahsie zhodnotil, ze sa mu hralo na nl10 - tam mal dokonca 50% vpip, kdezto predtym mal 30% na micro

0000010100063564064842160295261609282209

kabrhel spustil vlastny merch:
https://notlikethat.shop/

onedlho imho sa pusti aj to vlogovania, viaceri to naznacuju, ze si spravil tento rok pekne promo a planuje zarabat viac cez media nez pokrom

000001010006356406484216029526160928220909282262

on je strasne nesympaticky, nemozem si pomoct

00000101000635640648421602952616092822090928226209282263

co tak sledujem komentare, pritahuje pozornost a ludia viac sleduju videa, kde sa vyskytuje, sympatak/nesympatak, to mas jedno.

0000010100063564064842160295261609281198

https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comments/1kzkkpt/if_you_were_wondering_why_pepe_isnt_on_streams/

nejaka znama postavicka z high stakes streamov sa dostala do vazenia za prevazacstvo. cele vlaknmo potom rozobera, ze vacsina pokrovych hracov vlastne len perie prachy

0000010100063564064842160295261609279351

Texas poker games—especially in Dallas—have gotten significantly worse. The action is smaller, the games are less fun, and the main reason (according to the narrator) is a huge influx of international professional players (“Euros”) who grind every day, take money out of the ecosystem, don’t socialize, and overwhelm the player pool. This pushes out losing and recreational American players, making the games tougher, less profitable, and less enjoyable for everyone, even winning players.

The narrator shows one good high-stakes session but explains that such games have become rare. Many regulars have quit, moved down, switched to PLO, or gone to home/private games to avoid the pros. Entire tables break when Euros arrive, and even low-stakes games are affected.

He proposes four solutions:

International pros voluntarily give Texas a break.

Poker rooms require U.S. identification or an application process to limit foreign pros.

Open a new poker room that bans international pros.

(Joking) Build a wall around Texas cardrooms and make the Euros pay for it.

Overall: He believes the current influx of foreign pros is unsustainable, harming the ecosystem, and killing the fun/action that Texas poker was known for.

0000010100063564064842160295261609278569

sice som na toto narazil pri citani blbosti o black jacku, ale velmi jednoducho to vysvetluje variaciu, co vsetko clovek musi obetovat pre uspech, a ze preco aj keby amater (clovek co ma daily job, deti, vydavky, menej casu) vedel hrat perfect game, tak preco vacsina amaterov sa na to casom vyserie a zostanu len ti, co mali to stastie na dlhodobe upswingy az sa z nich potencialne stanu profici s potrebnym bankrolom:
Here's what 2% looks like conceptually: you and I flip a coin for a set dollar amount. You always take heads, I always take tails. The bet never changes and we must put up the money for 50 bets. After 50 rounds, I pay you exactly one bet and you don't have to flip for it. That's 2% +expected value. Is that game worth your time? Can you handle the natural swings (variance)? At what dollar amount would you be comfortable playing?