login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
who killed dubstep
template:
4
parent:
2step Vs Dubstep
owner:
opytz
viewed by:
created:
09.12.2011 - 09:51:30
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63528
63583
63648
6376191
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::4
total children::1
2
❤️
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
Who Killed Dubstep?
-
http://liquido.dk/index.php/12-secret-selector-selections/54-who-killed-dubstep
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006352800063583000636480637619106377697
krvsh
10.12.2011 - 01:49:38
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: who killed dubstep
toto je v podstate ta pointa, ktoru sa obcas niekomu snazim vysvetlit ked na to pride rec .. som rad, ze nasiel uplne trefny priklad:
These days, the lousy crap stereos are mostly replaced by even lousier crappier laptop speakers.
What does that mean to music?
As I mentioned, the early dubstep was made for big sound systems. There was really no intention of the tracks being heard by the masses outside clubs like FWD.
Now take another listen to
Goat Stare
. What happens at 1.25? It's the drop!
Unless you're listening on your laptop, like I am right now. Then nothing happens at all.
So what do you do, when you have a genre creeping its way from absurdly huge club sound systems to horrible computer speakers? You make tracks that aren't bass dependent.
But it still has to sound like dubstep. So what do we do? Wobble the midrange.
00000101000635280006358300063648063761910637769706386008
bakany
14.12.2011 - 15:33:41
[
1K
] , level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: who killed dubstep
podobne svinstvo sa dnes robi takmer vsade v hudbe.
staci spravit dynamicku alebo frekvencnu analyzu pri niektorych remastered ediciach starsich albumov (napr nirvana - nevermind). nova remastered nahravka ma castokrat objektivne mensi dynamicky rozsah. na frekvencnom grafe to vyzera ako nehybna stena plna frekvencii od 50-10000.
do toho najneskor mp3 kompresia odreze horne frekvencie pripadne to urobi iniciativne technik v studiu aby nahravka znela rovnako "dobre" aj na mobilnom telefone. vysledok dynamickej aj frekvencnej kompresie je ze v nahravke nepocut ziaden priestor znie to ako plocha nabudeneho zvuku tesne pred posluchacom.
basy sa castokrat orezavaju alebo naopak nabudia aby robili popici bordel na subwoofri..
ak si niekto mysli ze sucasna high-tech doba prinasa zvukovu kvalitu moze si pustit staru nahravku z konca 60s zaciatku 70s podla moznosti na lepsom zariadeni ako i-pod a plakat.
anyway toto imho nezabija vas zaner toto je naopak zivna poda pre nejaky sucasny hnoj ktoremu nerozumiem. ludia si poslednych 20 rokov doslova seru do usi.
00000101000635280006358300063648063761910637769706385907
Red RejveN
14.12.2011 - 15:09:10
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: who killed dubstep
A to som si pred casom robil picu z takehoto dubstepu, ze sa preto robi bez basov aby si ho 15rocne deti mohli na ulici pustat z mobilu:D
Smile.. It confuses people.
Bullshit makes the flowers grow and thats beautiful.
00000101000635280006358300063648063761910637769706384735
StiX
14.12.2011 - 02:02:28
(modif: 14.12.2011 - 02:10:35), level: 2,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[2]: who killed dubstep
no moj laptop uz ma aj subwoofer, ako nie ze by robil nejake mega basy ale je ich proste pocut, takze si dokazem s nim uzit aj takyto track, teda urcite by som celu tuto vec nehadzal na styl akym sa hudba pocuva, ja skor vidim potrebu pre agresivny sound, ludia ako by mali problem s tym ze pocuvaju a pri tom tancuju oni proste potrebuju nieco co ti otupi vsetky zmysly, tak nejak zahlti cele spektrum jednou vecou, a vytlaci hociaky detail prec