cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
4879893
5962834

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::2
total children::1
1 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


For centuries, children wore dainty white dresses up to age 6. (…) The march toward gender-specific clothes was neither linear nor rapid. Pink and blue arrived, along with other pastels, as colors for babies in the mid-19th century, yet the two colors were not promoted as gender signifiers until just before World War I—and even then, it took time for popular culture to sort things out.

cely clanok: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/When-Did-Girls-Start-Wearing-Pink.html




0000010100063539048798930596283405964679
¶
       22.04.2011 - 18:16:34 , level: 1, UP   NEW
For example, a Ladies’ Home Journal article in June 1918 said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.”

fíha.

000001010006353904879893059628340596467905967657
stardust
 stardust      25.04.2011 - 00:37:42 (modif: 25.04.2011 - 00:38:00), level: 2, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
tak vies, vyznam farieb spolu so vsetkymi konotaciami, ktore k nim mame, su iba socialny konstrukt :)