zaujimava metafora na sposoby myslenia, resp. nalady:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Thinking_Hats

Questions (White) - considering purely what information is available, what are the facts?
Emotions (Red) - instinctive gut reaction, emotional feeling (no justification)
Bad points judgment (Black) - logic applied to identifying flaws or barriers, seeking mismatch
Good points judgment (Yellow) - logic applied to identifying benefits, seeking harmony
Creativity (Green) - statements of provocation and investigation, seeing where a thought goes
Thinking (Blue) - thinking about thinking


Diskusie medzi ludmi s 'roznymi klobukmi' nezvyknu konvergovat k spolocnemu rieseniu. Pretoze ked su ovladani egom, ako to je zvykom, tak vacsinou konverguju do cierneho myslenia (logic applied to identifying flaws or barriers, seeking mismatch). Coho vysledkom nie su konstruktivne ale skor destruktivne koverzacie, napriek tomu ze ludia zdielaju ciele a nazory. V ciernom klobuku sa daju definovat problemy, ale neda sa hladat riesenie ak niekto diskutuje s ciernym klobukom. Pripadne aj ked ludia skacu medzi roznymi sposobmi myslenia, tak sa nikdy nedohodnu, pretoze kazdy hlada nieco ine - jeden rozmysla nad moznymi vyhodami, iny pocitovo, dalsi fakticky.

No a prave na to su dobre 'Six Thinking Hats', pomocou ktorych sa da zjednotit myslenie ludi. Symbolicky klobuk na hlave urcuje, akym sposobom rozmyslat, takze ak maju vsetci rovnake klobuky, budu si rozumiet. Ak si niekto zmeni klobuk, bude hned jasne, preco vznika problem. :)