"In places, Aristotle goes too far in deriving 'laws of the universe' from simple observation and over-stretched reason. Today's scientific method assumes that such thinking without sufficient facts is ineffective. His writings cover many subjects, including physics, metaphysics, poetry, theater, music, logic, rhetoric, politics, government, ethics, biology, and zoology. Aristotle's writings on science are largely qualitative, as opposed to quantitative."


lol, no ocividne to bolo strasne neefektivne, preto su ho aj po 2300+ rokoch plne internety..
tak asi to dpc bolo efektivne, ked za 2300 rokov sa nenasiel nikto inteligentnejsi (budem rad ak ma niekto opravi, ale furt narazam na aristotela vo vsetkych oblastiach, a navyse mi rezonuje jeho sposob myslenia)


"The history of science is filled with stories of scientists claiming a "flash of inspiration", or a hunch, which then motivated them to look for evidence to support or refute their idea. The success of a hypothesis lies in its ability to stimulate the research that will illuminate. In general scientists tend to look for theories that are "elegant" or "beautiful". ..because those are intuitive