login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[5]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
template:
4
parent:
Re[4]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
owner:
zviera
viewed by:
created:
11.08.2009 - 17:05:56
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
7763757
63577
64106
4845613
4845617
4845640
4845648
4845699
4853087
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
to je meatrix, bejby;]
.
ja nejem maso nieco cez 5 rokov a nestalo sa mi to, neviem preco - stava sa, ze mi to vonia, ale nutkanie to jest, to si nepamatam.
.
aka si krvna skupina?
title/content
title
content
user
0000010107763757000635770006410604845613048456170484564004845648048456990485308704853120
daemonique
11.08.2009 - 17:21:25
(modif: 11.08.2009 - 17:22:28), level: 1,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[6]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
hmm, zaujimave, priam neuveritelne, bejby...
kazdopadne mam 0 negativ, nie som ista negativom ..a ked si to nadhodila, spominam si raz, ze jeden pan cosi splietal o krvnych skupinach a mase..prej ti nulkovi su predatori najvacsi..
hm.. ci preco sa pytas?
000001010776375700063577000641060484561304845617048456400484564804845699048530870485312004853172
zviera
11.08.2009 - 17:50:44
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[7]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
presne preto mi to napadlo - 0 su vraj z genetickeho hladiska viac masozravi..Ackam vyhovuje najviac vege strava a Bcka su zas pastieri, mliecne vyrobky.
ja som typicke A, mozno preto nemam problem s chutami,
ked si 0, ti vraj tazsie znasaju vegetarianstvo
00000101077637570006357700064106048456130484561704845640048456480484569904853087048531200485317204853181
blurec
11.08.2009 - 17:54:10
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[8]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
vies, ze uz ezotericke povahy s tym prudim, ale odkial mas tieto informacie (konkretne zavislost stravy od krvnej skupiny)? pokial ma pamat neklame, nedavno som cital rozhovor s bukovskym a on to oznacil za hlupost - tiez som sa nedopatral nejakeho zdroja, ked som si to chcel overit.
0000010107763757000635770006410604845613048456170484564004845648048456990485308704853120048531720485318104853285
zviera
11.08.2009 - 19:10:29
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[9]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
netusim odkial, je to akysi mem - ani netvrdim, ze je to overene [ani neviem, co na to bukovsky] - len mi to prislo ako sympaticka moznost a zaujimava hypoteza
0000010107763757000635770006410604845613048456170484564004845648048456990485308704853120048531720485318104853189
daemonique
11.08.2009 - 17:58:44
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[9]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
inak, ja napriklad to pocujem uz od druheho cloveka, co zasa nie je az tak moc, ale asi odniekial ta info bude ..hmm
co sa tej nulky tyka..moj foto ma tiez nulku a ten teda ked nema denne maso, tak je z toho na nervy..zeleninu odmieta povacsine..
a ked o tom vie bukovsky..i ked to oznacil za blbost..hm, zdroj si nedopatral, co?
celkom by ma to zaujimalo
000001010776375700063577000641060484561304845617048456400484564804845699048530870485312004853172048531810485318904853206
blurec
11.08.2009 - 18:10:21
, level: 5,
UP
NEW
Re[10]: 06.08.2009-13:30:42
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_diet
Nevertheless, the consensus among dieticians, physicians, and scientists is that the theory is unsupported by scientific evidence. D'Adamo responds to some of the criticisms on his website.