login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re: 11.02.2009-3:59:13
template:
4
parent:
11.02.2009-3:59:13
owner:
C[elkom]iny
viewed by:
created:
12.02.2009 - 15:20:27
updated:
12.02.2009 - 15:21:15
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
1679337
4504983
4508723
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
na staryc aj novych public ipckach?
z vnutornej lanky alebo ja z vonku?
I can\'t explain myself
because I\'m not myself you see
I got lost in someone else...
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006354001679337045049830450872304509001
x00r
12.02.2009 - 16:54:24
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: 11.02.2009-3:59:13
Jedna sa o serverovne. Fyzicky ina lokalita a iny poskytovatel IP konektivity. Na starom mieste ma zostat 1 masina co bude redirectovat vsetok traffic.
NAT ma nevyhodu ze aj odpovede z novych IP pojdu spatne cez NATovaci server. To riesenie ze by server prijal poziadavku a preposlal ju na novu IP by (dufam) malo umoznit ze odpovede sa uz budu posielat priamo do ciela.
00000101000635400167933704504983045087230450900104514457
bon
14.02.2009 - 23:05:51
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 11.02.2009-3:59:13
vyziadam si paket od 1.2.3.4 a odpovie mi 9.8.7.6? nice :)
0000010100063540016793370450498304508723045090010451445704517486
w
16.02.2009 - 11:27:52
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[4]: 11.02.2009-3:59:13
ale coby, ved snatnem staru masinu :)
hovori sa tomu milostny trojuholnik v praxi
000001010006354001679337045049830450872304509001045144570451748604519908
x00r
17.02.2009 - 06:10:42
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[5]: 11.02.2009-3:59:13
Hm. To je pravda. Kurnik.
A inak pre mna je NAT proste NAT. Source NAT ci Destination NAT...
00000101000635400167933704504983045087230450900104509782
w
12.02.2009 - 22:22:26
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 11.02.2009-3:59:13
nechcem byt sprosty, ale vies aky je rozdiel medzi SNAT a DNAT?