http://za.creativecommons.org/commons-sense/dec2004.htm

According to Creative Commons Canada, there are, in fact, only two cc licences that would qualify as 'open source' if they were applied to software: the Attribution and the Attribution-ShareAlike licenses. The other four permutations containing the requirement of "no derivatives" and/or "no commercial use" wouldn't qualify because they don't allow users to make changes to the work or to charge for its use (GPL allows authors to charge nominal fees for reproducing CDs of the software etc).

znamena ze na dielo zalozene na open-source softveri sa moze pouzit len "attribution" alebo "attribution-sharealike" aby to nebolo v konflikte s GPL ? cize napriklad pouzit "non-commercial" by bolo v rozpore s GPL aj ked mne by neslo o zakaz komercneho pozuivania jednotlivych programov samozrejme, ale celeho "diela", nemusim ani ja mat poziadavku komercneho vyzitia ale hlavne nechcem aby to na komercne ucely vyuzivala (teoreticky) nejaka spolocnost