login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
lama question
template:
4
parent:
LINUX pro uplne zacatecniky
owner:
cyberdew96
viewed by:
created:
19.10.2007 - 13:38:44
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
63542
2109677
63692
3440288
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::3
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
architektura i386 a intel core2duo to ide dokopy?
title/content
title
content
user
00000101000635400006354202109677000636920344028803440817
sucho
19.10.2007 - 16:44:41
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: lama question
len doplnim ze pokial sa pytas kvoli nejakym balikom, tak mozes pouzit i686 aj x86_64. samozrejme ze aj i386, ale v tych nebudu optimalizacie pre funkcie, ktore c2d ma.
0000010100063540000635420210967700063692034402880344081703440869
cyberdew96
19.10.2007 - 17:07:58
(modif: 19.10.2007 - 17:08:58), level: 2,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[2]: lama question
idem davat debian a core2duo dokopy
000001010006354000063542021096770006369203440288034408170344086903440992
ventYl
19.10.2007 - 18:10:28
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: lama question
jeb na x86_64, niektore multimedialne sragory (flash, adobe pedofil reader atd.) na to nezozenies. pedofil reader by mohlo ist pustit v emulacii 32bitov, ale flash jedine v 32bitovom firefoxe.
00000101000635400006354202109677000636920344028803440817034408690344099203443078
techko
23.10.2007 - 09:21:12
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[4]: lama question
no ved si tam buchnes 32bitovi firefox a do thoo 32b flash plugin a mas vystarano,ziadna raketova veda
kludne chod do x86_64 ..fungujem na tom uz par rokov bez problemov
00000101000635400006354202109677000636920344028803440571
ventYl
19.10.2007 - 15:21:02
[
1K
] , level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: lama question
core2duo je prastary i386 nalozeny tonami neuzitocnych instrukcii ohackovany EM64T, ktore potiahli od AMD a rozsireniami pre SMP :)
00000101000635400006354202109677000636920344028803440293
Prince of Persia
19.10.2007 - 13:40:43
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: lama question
j