login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[2]: 10.04.2007-14:13:14
template:
4
parent:
Re: 10.04.2007-14:13:14
owner:
spectre
viewed by:
created:
10.04.2007 - 18:46:27
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
1102981
3044078
3044132
3044781
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
co je zle na tom sigma blesku?
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063537007589480110298103044078030441320304478103046489
bulY
11.04.2007 - 13:14:38
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 10.04.2007-14:13:14
horsi biuld ako canon (horsi plast - mensi odolnost pri padoch a narazoch)
menej pokrytych uhlov pri otacani
canon na rovnakom vykone (580ex) blyskne viac krat za sebou
a hlavne - sigma mi na 300d ako tak fungovala aj ked kedy tedy urobila taku vec ze blysla naplno (namiesto toho co nameral fotak) = prepalena fotka + dlho cakas na dobite .. na 350D bola uplne nepouzitelna, blyskla spravne tak v 50% pripadoch