cwbe coordinatez:
866
1551575
2834359
2886463

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::
total children::2
show[ 2 | 3] flat


http://www.intelligentagent.com/archive/Vol3_No1_polisci_smith.html

For better or worse, contemporary culture is network culture, and it's important to understand that network culture is by nature distributed culture. Modernism was about centralization, but the Network is decentralized - it is ubiquitous and omnipresent, although no less rigorously structured. Our relationships with institutions were once conducted around the site of the monolith - the bank, the church, the school, the county courthouse, these were all physical places and to transact business with the agency in question, you had to transport yourself to the physical address of the institution. In today's corporate lingo, we might say that these official relationships were "institution-centric." Networked, distributed culture, though, is "citizen-centric" (though we'd do more justice to the actual character of the relationship with the term "customer-centric").




0000086601551575028343590288646302889865
rot
 rot      25.01.2007 - 21:11:01 , level: 1, UP   NEW
hmm, podla mna cele trosku prehnane a nafuknute, co je IMHO dost typicke pre vsetkych prorokov precarity, sieti, multitud, singularit a ryhovanych ci hladkych ploch :). nemam pocit, ze by praca chodila za "obcanom" ("zakaznik" tiez pobavil) k nemu domov ako predavac vysavacov. šak aj basy zatial stoja.

000008660155157502834359028864630288986502905701
pikseliahky
 pikseliahky      02.02.2007 - 11:32:56 , level: 2, UP   NEW
no hej, smith neni ziadny zazrak, ale vsima si doraz na siete a sietovanie, ktory sa mozno stava/stane nejakou novou paradigmou...

0000086601551575028343590288646302889004
dusanson
 dusanson      25.01.2007 - 15:58:11 , level: 1, UP   NEW
v tomto odstavci sa mi zda ze len vymenil slovo postmodern za network..

000008660155157502834359028864630288900402889159
aschenblond
 aschenblond      25.01.2007 - 16:35:29 , level: 2, UP   NEW
ak by to tak bolo tak by postmoderna bola networkova, no a aka by bola doba po nej? ? /no ved netreba odpovedat len sa mi to spojilo s tym co som sa pytala v emaili...

00000866015515750283435902886463028890040288915902889768
dusanson
 dusanson      25.01.2007 - 20:32:50 , level: 3, UP   NEW
vela odkazov sa robi pri dnesnom teoretizovani sieti samozrejme na deleuza a guattariho, ktori sa im venovali v 70s (rhizome atd). stalo by urcite za to ich teoriu tu trochu rozvinut ak sa do toho niekomu chce.

pomenovavat linearne casove useky je modernisticky koncept, dnes nam neostava snad asi nic ako vhupnut do zivota, nechat rss citacku sledovat co sa deje inde a v spatnom zrkadle a so scedenou pozornostou sa o tom bavit tu a takto. no hej, vzdy bolo neskoro.

0000086601551575028343590288646302889004028891590288976802906020
aschenblond
 aschenblond      02.02.2007 - 13:12:13 , level: 4, UP   NEW
no ale koniec linearity nie je akoze teraz novy pojem. ale mozno je to pravda ze teraz sa to cele deje. o com sa predtym viac teoretizovalo...

000008660155157502834359028864630288900402889159028897680290602002906047
dusanson
 dusanson      02.02.2007 - 13:23:43 , level: 5, UP   NEW
linearnost relativizovala postmoderna

00000866015515750283435902886463028890040288915902889768029060200290604702906483
aschenblond
 aschenblond      02.02.2007 - 17:30:27 , level: 6, UP   NEW
jo