Woody Vasulka:
On the one hand, the CC is a tool to help artists get involved. However, I do not understand or see how the CC can benefit me as an artist as a live element of my own work.

Roland Honekamp:
Surely artist should be able to make money from their works. While the CC encourages the artists to give their works away for free, they are not forcing them to do so. One example of a strategy: if you are an unknown musician and you do not want to negotiate with the recording industry right now from a position of weakness. You can circulate some of your works under a CC license to build up your reputation and once you become well known – you can hide away some of your better songs and could seek to publish them commercially – not under CC licenses – and then you can be in a better position to negotiate a contract with a record producer. The second way of making money using a CC license is to give your works away for free and then ask people to make donations. Another concern, that an artist needs a large corpus of works to be inspired by and to work with is the very objective of the CC to create a parallel digital universe or stock of assets which would allow users and artists to do things which they are not normally allowed to do and it should enrich the capabilities of individual artists and the creative process as a whole.

z http://www.ericarts.org/web/files/73/en/artists-rights.pdf
co je report z workshopu "Artists Rights in a European Cultural Space" v janove v 2004

v Part I je rychly sumar vtedajsieho stavu C/C v troch castiach (text + Q&A):
The Copyright System: Latest Issues and Debates
Customising Copyright: CC Licensing
Imagining a World Without Copyright

v Part II autori styroch roznych projektov hovoria o tom ako pouzivaju copyright pre svoje veci: Egoboo Bits (digital publishing label which publishes works under GNU/GPL), Wasulkas Archive (online archiv pix a videi) a este nejake podivne dva