cwbe coordinatez:
101
63533
1911201
2605583

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::
total children::1
1 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


cinania su celkom ftipni ked chcu

China has ordered 18-20 rubidium atomic clocks, a key component of satellite navigation systems.
...
The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) database has 36 satellite slots registered to Compass.
...
What is Europe to do? The economic returns on Galileo must be protected if the project is to succeed. China could be given rights under the Supervisory Authority, minimizing its need for Compass. However, this would probably allow Chinese companies to build Galileo ground receivers, a potentially lucrative market that Europe would like to keep for itself. It would also give China access to the encrypted, and sensitive, public-safety signals. The stakes are high, but can Europe afford to call China’s bluff?

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002635.html

...virtually all GPS and Galileo frequencies are overlain by Compass. Not only that, but Compass retains additional frequencies that are not touched by either of the U.S. or European systems (a caveat: satellites rarely use all the frequencies included in their ITU registrations, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt). GPS’s civilian and military channels, Galileo’s open, commercial, and Public Regulated channels are all within those ranges. Only the frequencies used onboard GPS satellites for missile warnings were avoided – at least China was wise enough not to mess with that.

Compass could jam GPS or Galileo even if Compass is only a regional system for Asia with a limited number of satellites. In a military flare-up regarding Taiwan, China could certainly benefit from a complete denial of positioning services to the U.S. and its allies.

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002643.html




0000010100063533019112010260558302606132
mimmon
 mimmon      31.08.2006 - 19:43:49 , level: 1, UP   NEW
tu je o tom tiez trochu popisane:
Galieleo gets a Chinese overlay
China and Galileo, continued

Zda sa, ze Cina "vystrkuje rozky". Myslel som, ze im postaci participacia na projekte Galileo. Ale zda sa, ze nechcu hrat druhe husle.

Ale aj tak celkom nerozumiem v com je problem. Ved ak by Cinania pouzivali inu modulaciu, tak by nebol problem s rovnakymi frekvenciami. Alebo sa mylim?

(inak toto znie skoro ako (pokus o) vtip: In theory they could threaten to sell weapons to Taiwan. Taipei would certainly be happy to buy more submarines from Germany, France, or Sweden. If the Europeans can credibly threaten this, it may be the only card they really have.)

000001010006353301911201026055830260613202606379
roger
 roger      31.08.2006 - 22:33:57 , level: 2, UP   NEW
no tam hrozi to ze cinania by mohli umyselne rusit v pripade nudze gps a galileo pricom compass by fungoval na zvysnych frekvenciach. a zrazu tomahawk dako neleti tam kam ma... :)
inak tazko povedat co tym chcela EU dosiahnut ze nechame cinanov investovat do galilea, ale kody im potom nedame ani ziadne recievery made in china. ze sa budu tvarit ze regge.

00000101000635330191120102605583026061320260637902606858
mimmon
 mimmon      01.09.2006 - 10:56:26 (modif: 01.09.2006 - 11:09:41), level: 3, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
ja som myslel, ze bolo vytvorene akesi konzorcium EU + Cina + mozno nejaky mensi zaujemcovia a vsetci boli povazovani za plnohodntnych clenov..
ja sa vlastne ani Cine necudujem, ze sa chce "pomstit"... skor ma prekvapilo, ze taketo "detaily" sa neriesili predtym, ale teraz za pochodu...
---------------------------
upd.
Galileo and Compass (odpoved na mnou citovany vyssie uvedeny clanok)
(...)
China accepted a minor role from the beginning, and if they continue working with Galileo they can certainly receive additional scientific and technological insight into navigation systems.
(...)