Re: mulitosc~ :: Remember, remember, the velvet November


node:	Re: mulitosc~
template:	4
parent:	mulitosc~
owner:	Cicer
viewed by:
created:	27.03.2006 - 00:19:53

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63533
64889
2264019
2264064
2264091

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

oh super, I'll try it. There is definitely a difference for me when I'm using 1, 2, 3, or x dac~ - the volume/decivbels is louder with more and also (I think) the frequencies change. Like: A = 59 b = 4 c = 13 d = 5 e = 4. Start with 5 dac~ and then take them away one by one... with just 1 it is a slower pulse but with 6 it is pretty fast

00000101000635330006488902264019022640640226409102264102

thats because the sinewaves each have a different frequency. so when there are five the resulting function is pretty complex as compared to one sine (that complexity is perhaps what you call fast).. but i think the same result you get with one dac~ and at least you dont have to put many patchcords.. but everybody has his own style of working with pd..

0000010100063533000648890226401902264064022640910226410202264546

Yeah, I see, you're right. I tried for_eric and it is much more elegant than my patch. The *~ is very useful! When I cahnge it on the one dac~ it sounds the same as my patch with the many dac~. I also like it without the +1, +2, +3 etc, because I like the way very different frequencies sound together.