No podla mna to z toho az tak celkom neplynie. a moznoze ani podla lovelocka nie to zavisi od toho ci rozumiem tomu co citam alebo nie.

"When I talk of Gaia, the living Earth, I do not mean it literally. I do not mean it any more than do Bill Hamilton or Richard Dawkins intend their beautiful metaphors of selfish and spiteful genes to be taken seriously. I am quite sure they do not mean that genes take thought and act selfishly. So why should anyone think that I am so foolish as to think the Earth is alive and is a living organism? I have never said this but it has been attributed to me wrongly and carelessly." James Lovelock


http://www.ecolo.org/lovelock/lovelock-online_chat-00.htm
http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/scienceandnature/story/0,6000,375194,00.html
http://www.gaianet.fsbusiness.co.uk/gaiatheory.html
http://www.unu.edu/unupress/lecture1.html

Ale aspon ma to iniciovalo k prevereniu si danej problematiky a niecomu som nakoniec mozno trocha porozumel