login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
thus spoke maniax in 'divacka'
template:
4
parent:
thus spoke maniac in 'divacka'
owner:
mx
viewed by:
created:
14.06.2005 - 20:03:45
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
667804
1703834
1703849
1703879
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
tych ludi tam praveze chcem... mozno este trosku svetlejsich, ale povedal som si, ze ziaden postprocess... :)
a ten sum... ten urcite prec davat nebudem... slint :)
m.
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063537007589480066780401703834017038490170387901705625
Sedna
15.06.2005 - 14:10:51
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
thus spoke Sedna in 'divacka'
tiez som za to nechavat photku bez postprocesu, nech vieme aki sme fotografi, resp.len s minimalnymi upravami ked je to nevyhnutne
000001010006353700758948006678040170383401703849017038790170562501708116
IDKFA
16.06.2005 - 12:09:35
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
thus spoke fakereez in 'divacka'
Neviem si predstavit ze by som na naskenovane filmy neurobil pp. Negativ je strasne pruzny pri skenovani a bez pp sa malo kedy zhoduje v kvalite s fotografiou. Napr. ked fotis CB a ide ti o polotiene. Skener ich dost casto presvieti a este prida vlastne zrno/sum.
000001010006353700758948006678040170383401703849017038790170562501705658
bulY
15.06.2005 - 14:18:31
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
thus spoke bulY in 'divacka'
uff s digitalu musis postprocessit, inak je to polovicna robota. netvrdim ze uplne vsetky fotky a nejako brutalne. ale levels, curves [contrast] hue/sat a doostrit [najma pri zmensovani] treba urcite robit ... skoro vzdy :)
00000101000635370075894800667804017038340170384901703879017056250170565801707254
mx
15.06.2005 - 23:41:32
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
thus spoke maniax in 'divacka'
tuto som si povedal, ze chcem bez pp :)
m.