Saul Albert, ktory sa ukazal aj v burundi so streamovanou ad-hoc talkshow Talkaoke to vyriesil raz a navzdy:

Thinking again about how to articulate copyright and copyleft, there seems to be a need for a functional articulation of the reality of how this law is applied rather than the legalistic, utopian fantasy of an IP 'commons'. For this purpose I suggest the principles of 'CopyCan and CopyCant'. Simply, it is possible to copy 'CopyCan' material, and impossible to copy 'CopyCant'. No lawyers necessary. It become the responsibility of the producer to prevent the copying of their material. If this entails the implementation of DRM, fine. If it requires cyborgs to register a serial number keyed to an iris print and a cochlear implant for every piece of commercial music that they buy that prevents others from hearing the uniquely signed secure transmission of this audio unless they also buy it, fine. See how many people buy Britney's albums on these terms.


.......


You can CopyCan things that are already copyright or copyleft - it's a functional rebuttal of any kind of copy protection or legal mediation of ownership. If you can copy it, it's CopyCan. If you can't, it's CopyCant.

What would the CopyCan logo look like?



muhahahahaha


http://twenteenthcentury.com/uo/index.php/CopyCanCopyCant?PHPSESSID=8383d79734839fdf994a3ad301d738ec